Skip to content
Oil Prices Not Likely to Spike Anytime Soon Despite Russia Joining Recent OPEC Production Cut By Chuck Freedman, CFA, CAIA
October 27, 2016

The worldwide dynamic that has kept oil inventories overflowing for the last two years may have shifted late last month when the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) agreed to cut cartel production to drive up prices.

Commerce Trust Company
Now that non-OPEC member Russia, the world's largest single-country oil producer, has publicly declared its support for either a freeze or a cut of its own petroleum production, higher oil prices could eventually return over the long haul.

But existing surplus oil inventories will delay worldwide impact until well into 2017.

Oil has been essentially loitering between $40 and $52 per barrel for the last several months. Petroleum companies are hopeful that their coordinated cut may allow them to punch through the current price ceiling toward the much higher "old normal," when the price per barrel was in an $80 to $100 pre-glut range.

Stock market observers have recently noted that when oil flirts with its higher price range, the equity markets as a whole seem to follow upwards. While there has been a correlation between rising oil prices and a rising stock market in the past, that relationship may have recently broken down some.

Oil prices have risen more than 14% after OPEC's announcement in Algiers that it would reduce supply.1 U.S. markets, anecdotally, have been moderately volatile during this period, but confined to a trading range in the low 18,000s for the Dow Jones Industrial Average and 2120 to 2170 for the S&P 500.

So what can we expect in the coming months? In the past, Russia has waffled on its OPEC support. National output averaged a post-Soviet record of 11.1 million barrels a day in September as Russian investments in new fields are just beginning to gain traction.

OPEC, meanwhile, collectively pumps out about 33 million barrels of crude per day. The high volume output puts a lid on prices, and the $80 a barrel target that some analysts say is necessary for petroleum companies to make long-term plans is still a long way off.2

While the international drama continues to unfold, U.S. producers will be watching the upcoming national elections very carefully relative to domestic prospects for oil. Energy legislation could be a pivotal issue for some voters as lines are clearly drawn.

For example, if Democrats prevail in both the House of Representatives and Senate, more environmental protection legislation measures will likely be emphasized, possibly making it more of a challenge for energy and oil industry companies to get permits to build pipelines, update refineries, conduct exploration on federal lands, or work in anything not perceived as sustainable green energy sources. Oil frackers, in particular, may also be concerned as to what this will mean for their industry. On the other hand, wind and solar companies may see subsidies and tax breaks.3

If Republicans prevail, one can presume that the administration would be receptive to more drilling on federal lands, that pipeline-building restrictions would be relaxed, and that oil frackers would have more support for their industry.

OPEC meets again Nov. 30 in Vienna, Austria, where they will attempt to complete the agreement reached in September, and the U.S. election will have been decided by then. The outcome of these two very separate events could influence the future of oil prices for the immediate future.

TAKEAWAYS:
  • Despite tightening of OPEC or Russian oil production targets, existing surplus oil inventories will delay worldwide impact until well into 2017.
  • Depending upon the outcome of the U.S. elections, ensuing energy legislation could affect some oil companies.
  • Contact your Commerce advisor to discuss this report in greater detail. If you don't have an advisor, please call Commerce Trust Company at 1-855-295-7821.

Disclosures:

1. Bloomberg

2. Bloomberg

3. Cornerstone Macro, Oct. 12, 2016

Past performance is no guarantee of future results, and the opinions and other information in the investment commentary are as of Oct. 27, 2016. This summary is intended to provide general information only and is reflective of the opinions of Commerce Trust Company Investment Policy Committee.

This material is not a recommendation of any particular security, is not based on any particular financial situation or needs, and is not intended to replace the advice of a qualified attorney, tax advisor or investment professional. Diversification does not guarantee a profit or protect against all risk.

The information in this commentary should not be construed as an individualized recommendation of any kind. Strategies discussed here in a general manner may not be appropriate for everyone.

Commerce Trust does not provide tax advice or legal advice to customers. Consult a tax specialist regarding tax implications related to any product and specific financial situations.

Data contained herein from third-party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed. All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice depending upon worldwide market, economic or political conditions.

RELATED ARTICLES

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Chuck Freedman
Chuck M. Freedman, CFA®, CAIA Senior Vice President, Senior Portfolio Manager Commerce Trust Company
Chuck is a senior vice president and senior portfolio manager within the family office services group of Commerce Trust Company. Upon gaining a thorough understanding of a client’s needs and goals as well as assessing the client’s entire financial situation, he works with our investment research team to construct a portfolio to help clients achieve their long-term goals. Chuck comprehensively represents our research- and goals-based investment process, starting with the initial assessment and creation of an investment objective to ongoing evaluation and adjustments based on changing market and life circumstances. With a deep knowledge of the market and experience in investment management, he serves clients with thought leadership, insight, and consulting services. Prior to joining Commerce in October 2011, he was a senior vice president and the lead senior portfolio manager for U.S. Trust, Bank of America Private Wealth Management in Atlanta. In that role, Chuck was responsible for managing investment portfolios for high net worth individuals and for families, trusts, foundations, and other tax-exempt entities. In total, he has more than 30 years of financial and investment experience, developing creative solutions for complex financial situations. More recently, he has specialized in managing significant individual equity portfolios as well as implementing complex financial strategies that included the use of alternative investments. Chuck holds the Chartered Financial Analyst® and Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst designations. He has also successfully completed the Certified Public Accountant exam. He earned his master of business administration degree from the Kenan-Flagler Business School at University of North Carolina.
Skip to Navigation Back to top